Client satisfaction — Olwen Bright

Client Feedback

What Teams Say After Working With Us

Here's honest feedback from content and communications teams who've gone through the review, setup, or full programme with us.

← Back to Home

6+

Years of specialist work

80+

Teams across Malaysia

4.8/5

Average client rating

96%

Teams using tools 3+ months after delivery

Reviews

From the Teams We've Worked With

SL

Siti Lailawati

Content Manager · Kuala Lumpur

We started with the Tools Review because we genuinely weren't sure if caption helpers would work for our type of content — a lot of it mixes English and Malay in the same video. The written summary was clear and specific. It didn't oversell anything. We moved to the Caption Helper Setup about three weeks later. The checklist Farah put together caught things I wouldn't have thought to look for.

April 2025

RK

Rajesh Kumar

Digital Communications Lead · Petaling Jaya

The training session was better than I expected. Azim tailored it to the three people in the room, not a generic walkthrough. The team actually uses the tools now — which wasn't happening before when we just had the software and no structure around it. One thing I'd mention: the scheduling took a couple of extra days than initially planned, but the work itself was solid.

April 2025

NW

Nurul Wahida

Editorial Coordinator · Shah Alam

We went straight to the Accessibility Workflow Programme because we needed something that covered video, social, and our internal newsletter. The multi-channel setup made sense — the checklist for each channel is slightly different because the content and audience are different. Six weeks after delivery, the whole team is still following the process. The maintenance guide is actually being used.

May 2025

TH

Tan Hui Ling

Marketing Manager · Subang Jaya

Honest: I wasn't sure the review at RM 490 would tell me much I didn't already know. It did. The example they prepared using our actual product videos showed exactly where the alt-text was falling short. That alone changed how we briefed the team. We're booked in for the full setup next month.

April 2025

AM

Ahmad Muzaffar

Head of Content · Cyberjaya

What I appreciated most was that Olwen told us from the first call that one of the tools we'd been considering wasn't well suited to our content format. Other consultants would have just set it up and taken the fee. That honesty meant we started with the right tool and the setup actually worked from day one.

March 2025

FY

Fauziah Yusof

Communications Officer · Putrajaya

We're a small team and I was worried the Caption Helper Setup was sized for bigger organisations. It wasn't. Farah configured things specifically for our volume — we publish maybe three to four pieces a week — and the checklist matched that pace. The training session was two hours and covered everything without being overwhelming.

May 2025

Case Studies

A Closer Look at Three Engagements

Digital Media Publisher — KL Sentral

Accessibility Tools Review → Caption Helper Setup · 3 weeks total

Challenge

A content team producing 15–20 videos per week had caption quality inconsistencies — some were accurate, others introduced errors that made the content misleading for viewers relying on captions. They had a tool but no review process.

What We Did

Started with a Tools Review on a sample of 8 recent videos. Identified the three categories of error appearing most frequently. Configured the caption tool with adjusted outputs and built a checklist targeting those specific errors. Ran training with the four-person content team.

Outcome

Error rate in published captions dropped from an estimated 1 in 4 to fewer than 1 in 15 after four weeks of operating the new process. The review checklist is now embedded in their publishing workflow as a standard step.

"The checklist isn't something we look at occasionally — it's now part of what we do before a video goes up. That wasn't the case before."

— Content Team Lead

Corporate Communications Department — Petaling Jaya

Accessibility Workflow Programme · 4 weeks

Challenge

A 12-person communications department publishing across video, intranet, and external social channels had no consistent approach to alt-text. Each team member handled it differently, and image descriptions on their annual report were flagged internally as inadequate.

What We Did

Mapped all three content channels and the different team roles involved. Built channel-specific tool configurations and review checklists. Extended training covered all three channels and addressed the specific edge cases — branded images, charts, mixed-language captions. Review cycle two weeks post-delivery refined two checklist items.

Outcome

All three channels now follow a consistent process. The internal flag about the annual report was resolved by the time the review cycle ran. The maintenance guide is used quarterly by the team lead to brief new staff members.

"We needed something that worked across all our channels, not just one. The channel-specific checklists were the part that made it practical."

— Digital Communications Lead

Contact

Reach Us Directly

Office

Unit 6-2, Tower B, Plaza Sentral,
KL Sentral, 50470 Kuala Lumpur

Hours

Mon–Fri: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Sat: 10:00 AM – 2:00 PM

Credentials

Professional Recognition

WCAG Practitioner Certified

Full team certification · 2023

Malaysia Digital Content Excellence

Accessibility Category · 2024

Digital Accessibility Network MY

Member since 2021

4.8 / 5 Average Rating

From 80+ completed engagements

Ready to Work Together?

Send us a message and we'll come back to you within one business day to discuss the right starting point for your team.

Get in Touch